| Opinion | Pub Date | Short Title/District |
|---|---|---|
| 06a0419p.06 | 2006/11/13 | Cinti Women's Serv v. Voinovich Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati Abortions |
| 06a0420p.06 | 2006/11/13 | Hughes v. Sanders Southern District of Ohio at Columbus Bankruptcy: Discharge (judgment) |
| 06a0421p.06 | 2006/11/14 CRIMINAL |
USA v. Watford Western District of Kentucky at Louisville Criminal HAROLD A. ACKERMAN, Senior District Judge. Defendant-Appellant Marlon L. Watford appeals from the District Court’s judgment of conviction and sentence following a jury’s guilty verdicts on counts of narcotics and firearm possession. Watford, through his able counsel, contends that the District Court erred in several critical respects by allowing this case to proceed to trial after a lengthy pretrial delay during which the Government filed three superseding indictments. He also asserts that the District Court erred in its handling of voir dire and several sentencing-related issues. Having carefully considered Watford’s arguments in light of the record submitted on appeal, we find no reversible error in the District Court’s adjudication of this case. Accordingly, for the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM. |
| 06a0422a.06 | 2006/11/15 | USA v. Seymour Western District of Michigan at Marquette Evidence: KRE 403 (prior sexual molestations) |
| 06a0423p.06 | 2006/11/15 | USA v. Ganier Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville Criminal: FRCP 16(a)(1)(G) expert disclosures. |
| 06a0424p.06 | 2006/11/16 | Berri v. Gonzales Board of Immigration Appeals Immigration |
| 06a0425p.06 | 2006/11/16 | USA v. Ely Western District of Tennessee at Memphis Crimimal: Forfeitures, drug case |
| 06a0426p.06 | 2006/11/16 | Henderson v. Walled Lake |
Comments