Published Decisions
| Opinion | Short Title/District |
|---|---|
| 08a0037p.06 | USA v. Grenier Northern District of Ohio at Akron CRIMINAL CASE |
| 08a0038p.06 | Brooks v. Bagley Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland CRIMINAL CASE |
| 08a0039p.06 | Joliff v. NLRB National Labor Relations Board BOGGS, Chief Judge. John Jolliff and Steven Daniels petition for review of the Order of the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) denying their claims arising under § 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (“Act”), codified at 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1). Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) William G. Kocol originally found in the employees’ favor, holding that the employees had been terminated for engaging in an activity–writing a letter complaining about working conditions–that was protected under the Act. On review, the Board held that the employees’ activities were stripped of the Act’s protection because the letter contained a false statement made with actual malice. Jolliff and Daniels now petition for review. We grant their petition on the basis that the Board’s decision was not supported by substantial evidence and remand the case to the Board. |
| 08a0040p.06 | USA v. Conway Southern District of Ohio at Columbus CRIMINAL LAW |
| 08a0041p.06 | Bennett v. Kemper Natl Serv Inc Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Adrienne Bennett (“Bennett”) filed an action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132, against Kemper National Services, Inc. (“Kemper”), Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company (“Lumbermens”), Broadspire Services, Inc. (“Broadspire”), and Platinum Equity, L.L.C. (“Platinum”) (collectively “defendants”) arguing that the decision to deny her long-termdisability (“LTD”) benefits was arbitrary or capricious. The district court granted a judgment in favor of the defendants, and Bennett appealed. Because we conclude that the decision to deny benefits was not the result of a deliberate and principled reasoning process supported by substantial evidence, we VACATE the judgment of the district court and REMAND with instructions to remand to Broadspire for a full and fair review consistent with this opinion. |
| 08a0042p.06 | USA v. Vicol Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids CRIMINAL |
| 08a0043p.06 | USA v. Coker Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville CRIMINAL |
| 08a0044p.06 | Ross v. Petro Northern District of Ohio at Akron CRIMINAL |
| 08a0045p.06 | Fautenberry v. Mitchell Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati CRIMINAL |
| 08a0046p.06 | USA v. Madden Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland CRIMINAL |
| 08a0046p.06 | USA v. Brown Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland CRIMINAL |
Non-published decisions this week
| Opinion | Short Title/District |
|---|---|
| 08a0067n.06 | Wysong v. City of Heath Southern District of Ohio at Columbus |
| 08a0068n.06 | USA v. Cannady Eastern District of Kentucky at Ashland |
| 08a0069n.06 | Dorrough v. Tarpy Eastern District of Tennessee at Knoxville |
| 08a0070n.06 | USA v. Danou Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit |
| 08a0071n.06 | USA v. Harris Western District of Tennessee at Jackson |
| 08a0072n.06 | USA v. Ely Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids |
| 08a0073n.06 | USA v. Wells Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit |
| 08a0073n.06 | USA v. Wells Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit |
| 08a0074n.06 | Garcia v. Dykstra Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids |
| 08a0075n.06 | Overstreet v. Mack Indust Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland |
| 08a0076n.06 | Seck v. Mukasey Immigration & Naturalization Service |
| 08a0077n.06 | JACO Airfield Constr v. Natl Trust Ins Co Western District of Tennessee at Memphis |
| 08a0078n.06 | USA v. Jones Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville |
| 08a0079n.06 | Bohanan v. Bridgestone/Fireston Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville |
Comments